Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
ARVDWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Arboricultural Association - Monoliths: A Layman’s View
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
<br>The Oxford dictionary says a layman is a ‘non-skilled, non-expert’ with no must reside up to standards. 1. My expertise with useless standing bushes began at least 80 years ago, climbing them as a boy. Duncan prefers to call managed dead standing bushes snags and [https://liy.ke/brian672930460 Wood Ranger official] dislikes the time period monoliths. However, Philip Wilson in ‘my bible’, The A-Z of Tree Terms, defines snags as stubs, and non-arboricultural and non-forestry dictionaries have included several different meanings for the word, even ‘debris snagged up in flowing water’ and ‘clothing torn or snagged up on thorns or barbed wire and so forth.’ Therefore, while I agree our common language is stuffed with phrases that have several often completely totally different meanings, absolutely here's a case where in tree terms - and nearly confined to arboricultural use - a useless standing tree might be described utilizing a significantly better time period than snag. Philip Wilson’s A-Z defines a monolith as ‘a tree reduced to its principal stem’ and in his definition it may nonetheless be alive.<br><br><br><br>English dictionaries outline a monolith as ‘a single block of stone, especially shaped like a pillar or monument, a big block of concrete or thing like a monolith being massive, immoveable or solid uniform.’ Mono clearly means single and lith is stone. Surely all we must do is find a easy descriptive time period that may only seek advice from a managed useless standing tree? Let’s hope the ideas that comply with inspire some ideas from arbs. This type of tree management belongs to the arb world and the arb world ought to declare skilled ownership by finding the appropriate time period for it. As lith means stone, why not name a lifeless standing tree a mono-stub or mono-stump? Mono-trunk or mono-candle (French is chandele) are additionally choices. Mike Ellison has advised mono-ligna, mono-lignum, mono-lig or mono-stack. 2. Oak root plate with what remained of the supporting root system after the tree had been standing lifeless for maybe a number of decades.<br><br><br><br>3. William the Conqueror’s Oak at Windsor, maybe 1000 years outdated. How on earth can you name this a part of our nation’s history a snag? 4. Ancient useless elm monolith. My guess is the occupants of the home who determined to go away this tree standing have been very attention-grabbing individuals, contemplating the safety paranoia and [https://healthwiz.co.uk/index.php?title=Not_Ready_To_Purchase buy Wood Ranger Power Shears] mindless obsession with tidiness that prevail within the twenty first century. Bring on the youthful generations! 5. Dead standing oaks the place Roy Finch did plunge cuts in limbs and Bill Cathcart’s team at Windsor then winched the limbs off to depart monoliths with reasonably pure-wanting broken stub ends. My experience with lifeless standing timber began no less than eighty years in the past after i climbed into the lifeless hollow standing oak in picture 1 and collected either a barn or a tawny owl’s egg. In those days, all small boys residing in the countryside collected birds’ eggs. The tree is still there immediately, and obviously the surrounding bushes are actually of a considerable measurement and presumably increasingly provide it some safety.<br><br><br><br>Also, oak has durable heartwood and due to this fact it is most certainly that any supporting useless roots will decay a lot slower than in other species. Whilst we are on the topic, it's interesting to notice what number of arbs never differentiate between bushes with heartwood and ripewood when it is kind of obvious that the distinction may be very related within the case of lifeless standing timber, [https://goelancer.com/question/achieve-impeccable-accuracy-with-precision-cutting-tools/ buy Wood Ranger Power Shears] and the supporting root methods of conifers cannot be forgotten: it's greater than doubtless they decay slowly like oak. Many picturesque scenes of the Scottish glens have lifeless historical granny pines, bleached and seasoned, that repeatedly withstand very high winds. Photo 2 shows an oak root plate with what remained of the supporting root system after the tree had been standing useless for maybe a number of decades. It begs the question have been such seasoned buttress roots used by early man as plough [https://www.gitmate.dev/caitlynepp0926 buy Wood Ranger Power Shears]? Sadly, Duncan’s photos present trunks wherein all the limbs have been removed by the very outdated method of flush cutting to the primary stem (‘Towards steering on snags’, [http://mdias.online/doku.php?id=acme_united_co_po_ation buy Wood Ranger Power Shears] ARB Magazine 198). I say ‘outdated’ because a special strategy was developed as way back as 1997. Bob Warnock, Manager of Ashstead Common for the Corporation of London, wanted to keep up dozens of lifeless standing ancient pollard oaks (which had been tragically killed in a series of bracken thatch fires through the years) for historic, conservation and health and security causes.<br>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ARVDWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
My wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)